FP Markets vs IC Markets: Which Broker Is Better In 2026?
FP Markets vs IC Markets: Which Broker Is Better In 2026?
FP Markets and IC Markets are two of the strongest active-trader broker names in the GradTraders broker research bank. Both support major trading platforms, both are relevant for low-spread CFD trading, and both appeal to traders comparing cTrader, MetaTrader, TradingView and Raw-style pricing.
The short version is this: IC Markets remains my personal pick because I use it directly for active CFD trading, while FP Markets is the stronger research-led alternative for traders who want broader platform flexibility, especially the Iress share-market route.
Disclosure & Risk Notice: This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice, investment advice, tax advice or a personal recommendation. Trading CFDs, spread betting, forex, crypto CFDs and other leveraged products involves significant risk and may not be suitable for all traders. You may lose some or all of your capital. Some GradTraders articles may contain affiliate links or references to partner offers. If you sign up, purchase or open an account through certain links, GradTraders may earn a commission at no additional cost to you.
Looking for GradTraders partner offers, broker discounts, prop firm promotions and trading platform deals? You can view the current offers and join the update list here: Access GradTraders Partner Offers.
Quick Verdict: IC Markets Is My Personal Pick, FP Markets Is The Serious Alternative
If I had to choose between FP Markets and IC Markets today, my personal pick remains IC Markets because I have direct trading and withdrawal experience with the broker.
From a wider broker-research standpoint, FP Markets still deserves serious consideration because it offers MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView and Iress, giving it one of the broader platform line-ups in the active-trader space.
This is not a comparison where one broker is clearly weak. IC Markets wins for my own active CFD trading route. FP Markets wins if the trader specifically wants broader share-market access through Iress, or wants a strong IC Markets alternative with similar active-trader credentials.
Read The Full Individual Reviews First
This comparison gives the direct head-to-head verdict, but both brokers also have standalone GradTraders reviews. The full IC Markets Review 2026 explains why IC Markets is the broker I currently use personally. The full FP Markets Review 2026 explains why FP Markets remains one of the strongest research-led alternatives in the active-trader broker cluster.
That distinction matters. My IC Markets confidence is direct-use confidence. My FP Markets confidence is research-led confidence based on platform support, account structure, market access, public broker material and its repeated appearance across the wider GradTraders broker data bank.
FP Markets vs IC Markets: Key Differences
| Feature | FP Markets | IC Markets | GradTraders View |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broker position | Strong IC Markets alternative with broad platform support. | Current GradTraders personal broker route for active CFD trading. | IC for direct-use confidence |
| Platform options | MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView and Iress. | MT4, MT5, cTrader and TradingView. | FP Markets for breadth |
| Share-market access | Iress route gives it broader share-market relevance. | No equivalent Iress-style route identified in the GradTraders research. | FP Markets |
| Active CFD trading | Strong research-led profile for scalpers, day traders and cTrader users. | Strong direct-use profile based on my own index trading and withdrawals. | IC Markets |
| TradingView support | Yes. | Yes. | Both relevant |
| cTrader support | Yes. | Yes. | Both relevant |
| Overall verdict | Best if platform breadth and Iress matter. | Best if you value my direct broker experience. | Draw, different winners |
Where This Comparison Fits In The GradTraders Broker Bank
Since publishing the wider GradTraders broker data bank, IC Markets and FP Markets have become two of the main brokers compared across the active-trader cluster. They appear repeatedly in broker research around cTrader, TradingView, low spreads, scalping, day trading, index trading and Raw-style pricing.
IC Markets remains the personal benchmark because I trade with it directly. FP Markets remains a serious research-led candidate because the broker-bank research repeatedly places it among the strongest alternatives for platform flexibility, Raw pricing and active-trader suitability.
For wider context, start with the public GradTraders 24-broker comparison table, then use this comparison to narrow the decision between these two active-trader broker routes.
Reputation And Broker Position
Both brokers hold strong positions in active-trader broker research. IC Markets is one of the most established names in the low-spread CFD broker space and is the broker I currently use personally. FP Markets is also a serious comparison name, particularly because of its platform range, Raw account structure and Iress share-market route.
The difference is confidence type. With IC Markets, my view is backed by direct trading, withdrawal experience and daily platform use. With FP Markets, my view is research-led, based on platform support, account structure, broker history and its fit inside the wider GradTraders broker cluster.
Trading Experience
In my experience, IC Markets provides a stable and professional environment for active CFD trading, particularly around the short-term index trading style I use personally. My IC Markets view is based on actual use, including trading, withdrawals, platform reliability and how the broker fits my workflow.
FP Markets offers a highly versatile profile, especially for traders who want to move between traditional forex/CFD trading and broader share-market access through the Iress platform. I have not personally traded a live FP Markets account, so I would still want to test execution, spreads, withdrawals and platform behaviour before committing meaningful capital.
That is why this comparison gives IC Markets the edge for my own use while still treating FP Markets as a very credible alternative.
Pricing, Spreads And Trading Costs
Both brokers are relevant for traders comparing spreads, commissions and Raw-style pricing. IC Markets is the broker I continue to use personally, partly because the trading costs on the markets I trade most often have suited my strategy.
FP Markets also appears competitive from the GradTraders research, especially for traders comparing Raw pricing and platform flexibility. However, traders should always check live costs for the exact instruments, account type and legal entity they plan to use.
Winner: Draw. Both brokers offer pricing that will satisfy many active traders. The better choice depends more on the markets traded, the account entity, the platform route and the total cost of execution than one headline spread figure.
Platform Comparison: FP Markets Has The Broader Line-Up
FP Markets Platform Strengths
- MT4 and MT5 for MetaTrader traders.
- cTrader for traders who prefer a cleaner execution-focused platform.
- TradingView support for chart-led traders.
- Iress for broader share-market access.
- Strong platform flexibility for active traders comparing multiple workflows.
IC Markets Platform Strengths
- MT4 and MT5 for standard forex and CFD workflows.
- cTrader support, which is a major reason I use the broker.
- TradingView route for charting and analysis integration.
- Strong fit for my own active index-trading workflow.
- Direct-use confidence from my own account experience.
Winner: FP Markets, slightly. The Iress route gives FP Markets the broader platform range. For many forex, index and CFD traders, however, the practical difference may be smaller because both brokers support cTrader, MetaTrader and TradingView.
Which Broker Would I Choose?
Personally, I would choose IC Markets. That decision is based primarily on my personal experience of its execution quality, withdrawal reliability, platform setup and overall trading environment.
That does not make FP Markets weak. If I wanted broader share-market access, or if I was building a second broker shortlist around Iress, Raw pricing and platform breadth, FP Markets would be one of the first brokers I would investigate.
The clean distinction is this: IC Markets is the broker I trust from direct use. FP Markets is the broker that looks strongest when platform flexibility and Iress are given more weight.
Pros And Cons
FP Markets Pros
- MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView and Iress support.
- Unique broader share-market access through the Iress route.
- Competitive Raw-style pricing profile.
- Strong research-led comparison profile inside the GradTraders broker bank.
- Serious alternative to IC Markets and Pepperstone for active traders.
FP Markets Cons
- GradTraders confidence is research-led rather than direct-use experience.
- Iress may be unnecessary or expensive for many retail traders.
- Different entities, pricing and product conditions need careful checking.
- Execution, spreads and withdrawals should be tested personally before serious capital is committed.
IC Markets Pros
- Broker I personally use for active CFD trading.
- Strong cTrader and TradingView fit for my own workflow.
- Positive direct withdrawal experience.
- Strong active-trader profile across low-spread and index-trading research.
- My direct benchmark for comparing other active CFD brokers.
IC Markets Cons
- No equivalent Iress-style route identified in the GradTraders research.
- Entity and regulatory trade-offs must be understood before opening an account.
- UK traders should understand the CFD tax position versus spread betting.
- High leverage can increase risk if position sizing is poor.
Choose IC Markets If…
- You want the broker I personally use for active CFD trading.
- You prioritise low-spread index trading, cTrader and TradingView support.
- You value direct-use GradTraders confidence over research-led confidence.
- You are comfortable checking the IC Markets entity, leverage, withdrawal route and CFD tax position.
- You want a broker that sits at the centre of the GradTraders active-trader comparisons.
Choose FP Markets If…
- You want a serious IC Markets alternative with MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView and Iress support.
- You are specifically interested in broader share-market access through Iress.
- You want a research-led active-trader broker candidate with strong platform flexibility.
- You are willing to check the legal entity, pricing, withdrawals and product terms yourself.
- You want to compare Raw-style pricing beyond IC Markets and Pepperstone.
Final Verdict: Draw, But IC Markets Remains My Personal Pick
FP Markets offers strong versatility through its platform range and Iress route, while IC Markets remains my personal benchmark because I use it directly for active CFD trading.
For traders comparing low-spread brokers, platform choice and active-trader conditions, both brokers deserve consideration. The difference is that IC Markets is backed by my own trading and withdrawal experience, while FP Markets is a research-led alternative in this comparison.
The final GradTraders verdict is a draw. If I was opening an account tomorrow for my own trading style, I would personally choose IC Markets. From a research standpoint, FP Markets still deserves serious consideration, especially for traders who value platform flexibility, Raw account pricing and Iress market access.
FP Markets vs IC Markets FAQ
Is FP Markets better than IC Markets?
FP Markets may be better if you want the broader platform line-up, especially Iress for share-market access. IC Markets is my personal pick because I use it directly for active CFD trading.
Is IC Markets better than FP Markets?
IC Markets is better for my own trading because I have direct experience with its platform setup, withdrawals and active CFD conditions. FP Markets remains a serious research-led alternative.
Which broker has better platform choice?
FP Markets has the broader platform line-up because it supports MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView and Iress. IC Markets supports MT4, MT5, cTrader and TradingView.
Which broker would Matthew Jackson choose?
Between the two, Matthew Jackson would personally choose IC Markets because he uses it directly. FP Markets remains a strong alternative for traders who prioritise Iress and broader platform flexibility.
Are FP Markets and IC Markets suitable for beginners?
Both brokers are more naturally suited to traders who already understand CFDs, leverage, margin, platforms and risk. Beginners should start with education and demo practice before using leveraged products.
Source note: this comparison is based on GradTraders editorial judgement, the public GradTraders 24-broker comparison table, the individual IC Markets and FP Markets review research, platform and product-route checks, and direct IC Markets experience. FP Markets comments are research-led unless stated otherwise.
Risk reminder: broker availability, leverage, platform access, spreads, commissions, regulatory protection, product range and tax treatment can vary by country, legal entity and client classification. Always check the exact account route before opening an account.